WEBSTER GROVES, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: STACY PIERCE
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of STACY PIERCE in 51 EAGERS ROAD, WEBSTER GROVES, MO 63119 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334670627.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STACY PIERCE
- Site address
- 51 EAGERS ROAD
- City
- WEBSTER GROVES
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63119
- Mailing
- 7117 ELLENDALE PLACE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63143
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. At the job site located at 51 Eager Road, Webster Groves, on 5 June 2012, the employer did not ensure a proper access was provided for employees to access the ladder jack scaffold. As a result the employee had to climb over the pick board to access the working surface. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. At the job site located at 51 Eager Road, Webster Groves, on 5 June 2012, the employer did not ensure the ladder jack scaffold was placed far enough away from the energized power line or that the power line had been deenergized or covered and insulated to prevent accidental contact. As a result the employee used the scaffold while exposed to the energized electrical power line. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. At the job site located at 51 Eager Road, Webster Groves, on 5 June 2012, the employer did not ensure a fall protection system was in place to prevent the employee from falling from the roof. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation(s).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334670627.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.