Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO ZUNIGA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FERNANDO ZUNIGA in 5905 N. MESA, EL PASO, TX 79912 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 334678992.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fernando Zuniga — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fernando Zuniga is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FERNANDO ZUNIGA
Site address
5905 N. MESA
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79912
Mailing
5521 HOMER CIRLCE, EL PASO, TX 79912
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    On or about June 14, 2012, an employee working on the second level of a scaffold did not have head protection to protect him from possible head injury from falling objects such as plastering equipment and a five-gallon bucket, which contained plastering mud placed above on the upper level. The employee was exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall:    On or about June 14, 2012, an employee working on the first level of a two-tier scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards. The employee was exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports. One employee was exposed to a fall hazard approximately 13-feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure the scaffold base plate was level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without displacement. The base plate on the far left and backside of the scaffold was resting only half way on solid cement. The other half was sticking out without a foundation below, making the scaffold unstable. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 13-feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    On or about June 14, 2012, two employees were observed climbing onto a scaffold platform where no ladder or direct access from another scaffold was provided. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard approximately 13-feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E09 IV

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress:    On or about June 14, 2012, two employees were observed using the cross braces of the tubular welded frame scaffold as a means of access or egress. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard approximately 13-feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:    On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the scaffolds were erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about June 14, 2012, two employees observed working on a scaffold platform 13-foot from the ground were not protected from falling by the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not have each employee trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Fernando Zuniga's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334678992.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.