Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: EDIFICE REMODEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDIFICE REMODEL in 908 PENNYOAKS DRIVE, MACOMB, IL 61455 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334685583.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edifice Remodel for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edifice Remodel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDIFICE REMODEL
Site address
908 PENNYOAKS DRIVE
City
MACOMB
State
IL
ZIP
61455
Mailing
8360 E 1550TH STREET, MACOMB, IL 61455
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while removing and installing roofing material and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while removing and installing roofing material and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):   Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:    Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards in the eyes from the use of a pneumatic nail gun while installing roofing material without safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately 9 feet while removing and installing roofing material and no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1600
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards which enables each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards:    Employees removing and installing roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard up to  approximately 9 feet to the ground below and the employees were not provided training which would have enabled them to recognize the hazards of falling and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2012
Abate by
Jul 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):     The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334685583.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.