Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARINE AND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARINE AND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC. in CAPE HENRY ALAMEDA POINT, ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 334705001.

Watch Marine AND Industrial Services INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marine AND Industrial Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CAPE HENRY ALAMEDA POINT
City
ALAMEDA
State
CA
ZIP
94501
Mailing
2391 W 10TH, ANTIOCH, CA 94561
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01 VIII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(viii): The employer did not provide training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, deck number one:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, an employee was wearing a 3M 7500 dual cartridge respirator.  The employee was not trained on the proper use of the respirator, including putting on and removing it, any limitations on the use, and how to maintain the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $630
  • — Z (S) $900

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) : The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, deck number one:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, an employee was wearing a 3M 7500 dual cartridge respirator who had not been medically evaluated prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, deck number one: On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, an employee was wearing a 3M 7500 dual cartridge respirator and had not been fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, deck one:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were allowed to operate a Yale 4750 lb forklift and had not been trained in the safe operation of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $630
  • — Z (S) $900

1915.12 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.12(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee entering a confined or enclosed space or other areas with dangerous atmospheres was trained to perform all required duties safely:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, number two ballast tank:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, an employee was working inside the tank that had not been trained to perform all required duties safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $630
  • — Z (S) $900

1915.12 E02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.12(e)(2): The employer did not inform outside rescue teams of the hazards that the team may encounter when called to perform confined and enclosed space or other dangerous atmosphere rescue at the employers facility so that the rescue team can be trained and equipped:      a) Onboard MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, number  two and four ballast tanks: On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, employees were working inside a confined spaces and the employer had not informed the outside rescue team of the hazards they may encounter if called to rescue employees from the space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.502 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.502(c)(1): The employer did not review the fire safety plan with employees:      a) Onboard the MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY: On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not review the fire safety plan with employees upon initial assignment to work onboard the ship.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $630
  • — Z (S) $900

1915.508 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $900.00 · Current $630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.508(e)(1): The employer did not ensure that each fire watch employee was trained by an instructor with adequate fire watch knowledge and experience:       a) Onboard the MARAD vessel CAPE HENRY, number two ballast tank:  On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, a fire watch was not provided training by a person with an adequate fire watch knowledge and experience.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $630
  • — Z (S) $900

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334705001.