MANSFIELD, TX —
OSHA Inspection: HONEYWELL ELECTRONIC CHEMICALS, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HONEYWELL ELECTRONIC CHEMICALS, LLC in 100 US HIGHWAY 287 NORTH, MANSFIELD, TX 76063 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 334707197.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HONEYWELL ELECTRONIC CHEMICALS, LLC
- Site address
- 100 US HIGHWAY 287 NORTH
- City
- MANSFIELD
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76063
- Mailing
- 100 US HIGHWAY 287 NORTH, MANSFIELD, TX 76063
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424690
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": On or about June 15, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the east side exit door in the Anhydrous Ammonia unloading area was clearly marked by a sign reading "EXIT". Employees were exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2000
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID's) were not accurate and did not represent equipment that was existing and was part of the process. On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the P&ID's were current and up to date, including but not limited to: a) In the isopropyl alcohol unloading port, a y-strainer filter on or about April 22, 2007, was not identified on the P&ID, IPA drawing # 0401. b) In the isopropyl alcohol feed filter area, a dp indicator, installed on on or about December 12, 2006 was not indiacted on the P&ID, IPA Drawing # 0401.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3000
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (REGAGEP). On or about June 14, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the Anhydrous Ammonia (aNH3) and Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) systems complied with recognized and general accepted good engineering practices according to national and industry consensus codes, standards and recommended practices such as but not limited to the following: a) In the 1st floor ammonia scrubber area, the scrubber circulation pump (P-0303) was not labeled or identified. b) In the 1st floor ammonia scrubber area, the 1: pipe (NH4OH-3104-TL4A) from the D-0303 aNH3 Scrubber to the V-3336 valve was not labeled with its identity, physical state, relative pressure and direction of flow. c) In the 2nd floor IPA evaporator area, cetain valves were not labeled or identified.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4200
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 F01 I C
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(C): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting temporary operations. On or about June 14, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not establish written procedures or clear procedures, such as but not limited to: a) Unloading of Anhydrous Ammonia b) In the Anhydrous Ammonia unloading building, the employers supervisor overrides the ammonia monitoring system as a matter of practice, disabling the ammonia alarms, each time during the unloading process.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4200
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not implement procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 F03
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The employer did not annually certify that operating procedures were current and accurate. On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not ensure that the standard operating procedures were accurate and certified annually, procedures such as but not limited to: a) Isopropyl Alcohol Process Response b) Alarms and Troubleshooting c) Isopropyl Alcohol-Shutdown of Operations d) Isopropyl Alcohol-Emergency Shutdown
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4200
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.119 M04
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(m)(4): An incident report was not prepared at the conclusion of the investigation that included at a minimum, the date of the incident, date the investigation began, a description of the incident, and any recommendations resulting from the investigation. On or about June 14, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not include the date the incident investigation began in their final investigation report.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1500
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: On or about June 14, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide posted danger signs or take effective measures to prevent employees from entering in to permit-confined spaces. Employees were exposed to asphyxiation and other fire and chemical hazards. A sign reading DANGER-PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE, DO NOT ENTER or using other similar language would satisfy the requirement for a sign. In the outside IPA storage tank area, tank T0405B did not have a label to warn employees of the confined space hazard and the opened space was not guarded to prevent unauthorized entry.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4200
- — C (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $7000
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: On or about June 14, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have fire extinguishers identified or labeled throughout the facility. Employees were exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): Chemical manufacturers, importers, or distributors did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals leaving the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200 On or about June 14, 2012, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure totes and other containers storing or having stored hazardous chemicals and leaving the workplace, such as but not limited to, sulfuric acid, anhydrous ammonia and isopropyl alcohol were labeled, tagged and marked according to 29 CFR 1910.1200. Employees were exposed to chemical burns and fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v): On or about June 14, 2012, the employer did not label workplace hazardous chemical containers and piping, such as but not limited to: a) The sulfuric acid container being used outside the Isopropyl Alcohol/Ammonia processing building next to the acid and caustic feed tanks. b) The piping systems for Isopropyl Alcohol and Ammonia were not kept marked or color coded.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424690)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334707197.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.