BRECKSVILLE, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: D. NIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D. NIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 8938 BRECKSVILLE RD., BRECKSVILLE, OH 44141 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334714185.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D. NIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 8938 BRECKSVILLE RD.
- City
- BRECKSVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44141
- Mailing
- 5459 S.R. 534, WINDSOR, OH 44099
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: As of March 18, 2013, abatement certification had not been received on citation #1, Item#1(documentation of site specific safety and health program). The abatement date was August 15, 2012.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or before June 15, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not provide programs that identify and eliminate the hazards, such as eye protection, head protection, fall protection, and other hazards associated with the work being performed at the worksite
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $500
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. On or about June 15, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer allowed employees to work on a roof that was approximately 15.5 feet high with a 4/12 pitch and did not ensure that the employees were protected from falls.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $500
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334714185.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.