CLINTON, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: J & E WARNER & SONS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J & E WARNER & SONS in 62 EAST MAIN STREET, CLINTON, CT 06413 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 334732609.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J & E WARNER & SONS
- Site address
- 62 EAST MAIN STREET
- City
- CLINTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06413
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 615, CLINTON, CT 06413
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $950 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Job site: The employee who was painting from the basket of the articulating boom aerial lift was not wearing a full body harness with the lanyard attached to the basket or boom. Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $950
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 4, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $950 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Job site: The employee who was exposed fall hazards while working from the articulating boom man lift basket was not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $950
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334732609.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.