Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: A & I MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A & I MASONRY, INC. in 6416 TALBOT, COLLEYVILLE, TX 76034 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 334737384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & I Masonry, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & I Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A & I MASONRY, INC.
Site address
6416 TALBOT
City
COLLEYVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
76034
Mailing
801 CRYSTAL CREEK, ARLINGTON, TX 76001
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end.        On or about June 13, 2013, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while working on a platform that extended more than 18 inches over its support.  No guard rails were installed to prevent the employee from accessing the end of the platform and causing it to tip.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:      On or about June 13, 2012, employees worked from a scaffold erected without base plates.  Employees were exposed to hazards caused by the scaffold collapsing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:      On or before June 13, 2012, the employer did not ensure the scaffold was inspected before each shift.  Cross bracing on the lower level of the scaffold was not properly secured.  Employees were exposed to the scaffold collapsing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 V

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway.      On or about June 13, 2012, employees worked from a scaffold erected with an unguarded walkway exposing employees to a fall of approximately 13 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.      On or about June 13, 2012, employees working on a scaffold platforms higher than 10 feet above the next level were not protected by a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects:      On or about June 13, 2012, employees were exposed to being struck by objects falling from the scaffold.  Hand tools and materials were stored on levels not equipped with toe boards, screens or other methods.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      On or about June 13, 2012, the ladder used to access the second level of the scaffold did not extend 3 feet above the landing.  Employees were exposed to a fall hazard when mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.454 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2012
Abate by
Oct 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:        On or about June 13, 2012, employees were not adequately trained to recognize and avoid hazards associated with scaffold erection and/or dismantling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View A & I Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334737384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.