Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: ELRAC, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ELRAC, LLC in 155 WEST MAIN ST -BRANCH 24CE BRANCH 24CE, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 532111). OSHA activity number 334798840.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elrac, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elrac, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELRAC, LLC
Site address
155 WEST MAIN ST -BRANCH 24CE BRANCH 24CE
City
BRANFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06405
Mailing
131 DANBURY RD, WILTON, CT 06897
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
532111
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:     155 West Main Street Branford, CT: The employer did not ensure that the employees mixing and handling chemicals, including but not limited to Super Natural Dressing # 6212, Spot Shot (containing 2-Butoxyethanol), Streak Proof glass cleaner (containing ammonia) and Safety Kleen NF 1000 Ice Breaker (containing methanol) were wearing appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1650
  • · Z (S) $3300

1910.138 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.     155 West Main Street Branford, CT: The employer did not ensure that the employees mixing and handling chemicals, including but not limited to Super Natural Dressing # 6212, Spot Shot (containing 2-Butoxyethanol), Streak Proof glass cleaner (containing ammonia) and Safety Kleen NF 1000 Ice Breaker (containing methanol) were wearing appropriate hand protection
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1650
  • · Z (S) $3300

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    155 West Main Street Branford, CT : The employer did not establish, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program where employees were expected to work with chemicals, including but not limited to,  Super Natural Dressing # 6212, Spot Shot (containing 2-Butoxyethanol), Streak Proof glass cleaner (containing ammonia) and  Safety Kleen NF 1000 Ice Breaker (containing methanol).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1650
  • · Z (S) $3300

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    155 West Main Street, Branford, CT: The employees, expected to work with  chemicals, including but not limited to, Super Natural Dressing # 6212, Spot Shot ( containing 2-Butoxyethanol), Streak Proof glass cleaner (containing ammonia) and  Safety Kleen NF 1000 Ice Breaker( containing methanol), were not provided with information and training in the hazardous  chemical communication.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2012
Abate by
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet (MSDS):    155 West Main Street Branford, CT :  The employer did not have a list of chemicals to reference their MSDSs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Elrac, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334798840.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.