ASTORIA, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: ENERGEX LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ENERGEX LLC in 29-14 9TH STREET, ASTORIA, NY 11102 (NAICS 327999). OSHA activity number 334802998.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENERGEX LLC
- Site address
- 29-14 9TH STREET
- City
- ASTORIA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11102
- Mailing
- 29-14 9TH STREET, ASTORIA, NY 11102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327999
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition. Where wet processes were used, drainage was not maintained: (a) Mixer Platform Stucco paint had filled all grate openings on the platform creating a solid uneven surface that did not provide drainage; on or about 06/22/12. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $300
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: a) In and around the paint mixer - Operators were not protected from falling from the platform; on or about 06/22/12. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $300
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.23 D01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
CFR 29 1910.23(d)(1): Every Flight of stairs having four or more risers shall be equipped with standard railings or standard handrails: (a) Stairways leading to mixing platform - The stairways did not have stair rails on the right side and left sides did not have intermediate rails; on or about 06/22/12. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $300
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by moving parts: (a) Paint Mixer The vat, which housed rotating paddles used to combine materials was not guarded; on or about 06/22/12. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $ 1,000.00 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): (a) In the Warehouse Employees who operated forklifts were not certified their safe operation; on or about 06/22/12. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $540
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) In the mixing room - Employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators when mixing paint; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) In the mixing room - Employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators when mixing paint; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) In the mixing room - Employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators when mixing paint; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to wear respirators in accordance with this paragraph: (a) In the mixing room - Employees who were required to wear half-mask respirators when mixing paint; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) At the worksite - The employer did not maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for chemicals such as but not limited to Dolomitic Limestone, Walocel, Acrylic Resin, and Sachtlben Rutile; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area: (a) At the worksite - For employees who use chemicals such as but not limited to Dolomitic Limestone, Walocel, Acrylic Resin, and Sachtlben Rutile; on or about 06/22/12.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Energex LLC
View Energex LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327999)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334802998.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.