ROSEMARY BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: J & F FRAMING, LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J & F FRAMING, LLC. in 113 KINGSTON STREET, ROSEMARY BEACH, FL 32461 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334807542.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J & F FRAMING, LLC.
- Site address
- 113 KINGSTON STREET
- City
- ROSEMARY BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32461
- Mailing
- 809 INDIAN WOMAN ROAD, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32459
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. a. On or about June 13, 2012, on the 3rd level of the structure, an employee performing framing operations was not protected from the hazard of falling 23 feet to the surface by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any fall protection. b. On or about June 13, 2012, on the 2nd level of the structure, an employee performing framing operations was not protected from a 11.8 feet fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1052 C04
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(4): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structural members, shall be provided between the top rail of the stairrail system and the stairway steps. a. On or about June 13, 2012, employees used a stairway system that did not have a midrail system, screens or mesh establised, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a. On or about June 13, 2012, employees used a 20 ft. Louisville extension ladder to access the 3rd level of the structure that did not extend 3 ft. above the floor landing, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders shall be inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after any occurrence that could affect their safe use. a. On or about June 13, 2012, a 20 ft. Louisville extension ladder used by employees was not inspected for defects in that the foot pads were not locked into place,exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334807542.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.