Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: THE VOLZKE CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE VOLZKE CORPORATION in 400 5TH, UTICA, NE 68456 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 334815396.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Volzke Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Volzke Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 5TH
City
UTICA
State
NE
ZIP
68456
Mailing
PO BOX 308, UTICA, NE 68456
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1):  Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (Outside Concrete Bin Platform): Employees were accessing the top of a platform during the loading of concrete trucks without fall protection. The platform was approximately 10 feet in height.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated, and rendered inoperative in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4):                                                           400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (Site-Wide):  There was no energy control program provided by the employer that met the requirements of 1910.147, including but not limited to;     a) Authorized employees servicing equipment; including but not limted to; the Buffalo Punch Press  b) Non-authorized employees whose work operations may be in a area where energy control procedures are being utilized and;  c) Outside contractors engaged in activities covered by this standard.    Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Dec 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):  The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (Site-Wide): The employer did not ensure that employees had been trained and evaluated prior to operating the Clark propane forklift.    Abatement certification is required for this violation.  Abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456  (Pump Room Lathe Area): The employer did not ensure that adequate machine guarding was provided on the Clausing Lathe, where the rotating chuck was not guarded while the lathe was in use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:                                                                                                                                  400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (1st Bag Room): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch on the 8" Baldor bench grinder. The adjustment was an opening of 1 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  		  400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (1st Bag Room): A tongue guard on the 8" Baldor bench grinder was not being used to ensure that it was adjusted to a 1/4 inch opening. The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top opening was 1 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):  Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456  (Pump Room): The employer did not ensure that a pulley was adequately guarded on the Bridgeport drill press.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven (7) feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (Pump Room): The employer did not ensure that the horizontal belt was adequately guarded on the Bridgeport drill press.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.304 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(2)(ii): Receptacles and cord connectors having grounding contacts shall have those contacts effectively grounded except for receptacles mounted on portable and vehicle-mounted generators in accordance with paragraph (g)(3) of this section and replacement receptacles installed in accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section:    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (2nd Bay): The employer did not ensure that an electrical receptacle being used in the 1st Bay by the overhead door did not have an open ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2012
Abate by
Feb 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    400 5th St., Utica, NE 68456 (2nd Bay)  - The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program meeting the minimum requirements specified in this subpart. The company does not have a program in any capacity. Employees were using chemicals including, but not limited to; motor oil.    Abatement certification is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with this citation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334815396.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.