Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: US CONSTRUCTION

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of US CONSTRUCTION in 1102 N HOPE STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19123 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 334865805.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch US Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for US Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
US CONSTRUCTION
Site address
1102 N HOPE STREET
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19123
Mailing
12TH & CALLOWHILL STS, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19123
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts:  Employer did not keep the work area clear of debris.  Various tools, scrap, wood and various other construction debris were located throughout the working area, limiting travel and exposing employees to tripping hazards, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $780
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):     Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts, Philadelphia, PA:  Employees were applying stucco to the wall of the building from the 5th working level of a fabricated frame scaffolding platform that was not fully planked or decked, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1820
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1):     Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts: Employees were applying mortar to a wall from a fabricated frame scaffold approximately 32' above ground level without guys, ties or braces to prevent tipping or collapse, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1820
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,820 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):     Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts:  Employees were not protected from fall hazards of up to approximately 32' above ground level while working from a fabricated frame scaffold, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1820
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Oct 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(14):     Makeshift devices, such as but not limited to boxes and barrels, were used on top of scaffold platforms to increase the working level height of employees:    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts: Employees were observed using a 5 gallon plastic bucket to increase the working level height on the 5th working level of a fabricated frame scaffold, observed on or about June 1, 2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 A07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(a)(7): Slippery conditions on stairways were not eliminated before the stairways were used:    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts: Slippery conditions on stairways were not eliminated. Interior stairways were covered with plastic material that was causing a slipping condition to employees that use the stairway to access to upper floors of the structure, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $780
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1052 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts:  Stairways leading into the structure used for employee access were not equipped with at least one handrail, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2012
Abate by
Nov 6, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,560 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    a) Jobsite, Hope & Hancock Sts:  Employees were using an 8ft portable ladder to gain access to the roof through an open roof hatch and the portable ladder was not long enough for safe mounting and dismouting and it was not supported or equipped with a grasping device. The distance between the top of the ladder and the bottom of the hatch was approximately 3ft, observed on or about June 1, 2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1560
  • — C (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $2400

View US Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334865805.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.