Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: BATECO, INC

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of BATECO, INC in 802 KOOP AVE, LOUISVILLE, NE 68037 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334872181.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bateco, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bateco, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BATECO, INC
Site address
802 KOOP AVE
City
LOUISVILLE
State
NE
ZIP
68037
Mailing
10421 N 190 AVE, BENNINGTON, NE 68007
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2012
Abate by
Aug 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $1,530
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    Job site located at 802 Koop Ave, Louisville, NE-Employee exposed to a fall of over 18 feet to the ground level while engaged in residential construction activities constructing a new barn at the site without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1530

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334872181.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.