NORCROSS, GA —
OSHA Inspection: CUNA, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CUNA, INC. in 5328 BROADWOOD AVE., NORCROSS, GA 30092 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 334882784.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CUNA, INC.
- Site address
- 5328 BROADWOOD AVE.
- City
- NORCROSS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30092
- Mailing
- 290 CARRUTH DR. SE, MARIETTA, GA 30060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the employees who were bringing bricks and mortar to the base of the scaffold and using the rope and pulley to pull buckets of bricks and mortar to the top of the scaffold were not wearing hard hats. In addition, scaffold frames were also being pulled up to the top level in order to increase the height of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the employees were working on a scaffold more than 22 feet high that did not have toeboards to protect the employees below from falling brick, mortar, buckets, and scaffold sections.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards when the employees were working on or near a scaffold that was being supported by the garage roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 22 feet and struck-by hazards when the employees were working on and near a scaffold that was had not been fully decked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet when the employees were working on a scaffold that did not have a ladder to permit safe access to the upper levels of the scaffold. Employees were climbing on the supports to access the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet and higher and struck-by hazards when the employees were working on or near a scaffold that had not been assembled (and were in the process of assembling another level) by a competent person who would have insured that the structure did not include hazards such as, but not limited to, no ladder, no toe boards, missing guardrails, missing decking, and missing ladder(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet and higher when the employees were working on a scaffold that did not have guardrails in the areas where the employees were working.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet and higher when the employees were working on a scaffold that did not have guardrails in the areas where the employees were assembling the scaffold. Employees were using a rope to pull up a scaffold support and installing it with no guardrails or fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would secure vertical members together laterally, and the cross braces were not of such length as would automatically square and align vertical members so that the erected scaffold was always plumb, level, and square: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards when the employees were working on and near a scaffold that was missing cross bracing which resulted in supports that were not plumb and square.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards when the employees had not been trained to recognize hazards such as, but not limited to, scaffolds that did not have fall protection such as guardrails, scaffolds that were not fully decked, scaffolds that were not plumb, scaffolds with no ladder, and scaffolds that were not assembled using pins.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a hazard communication program. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not have a safety data sheet for each chemical in use. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about June 27, 2012, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not provide employees information on the location of the program and MSDS. Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, mortar mix.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Cuna, INC.
View Cuna, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334882784.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.