O FALLON, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: LASER LIPO AND VEIN CENTER
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LASER LIPO AND VEIN CENTER in 3449 PHEASANT MEADOW DRIVE SUITE 100, O FALLON, MO 63368 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 334905189.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LASER LIPO AND VEIN CENTER
- Site address
- 3449 PHEASANT MEADOW DRIVE SUITE 100
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63368
- Mailing
- 3449 PHEASANT MEADOW DRIVE SUITE 100, O FALLON, MO 63368
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 622110
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 D04 III B1III
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(B)(1)(iii) Regulated waste was placed in containers which were not labeled or color-coded in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i): 1) Regulated waste was not placed in containers which were closeable, leak-proof, and labeled or color-coded in accordance with paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this standard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $714
- · Z (S) $1020
1910.1030 D04 IV A 2
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A)(2): Contaminated laundry was not placed and/or transported in bags or containers which were labeled or color-coded in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(1)(i). When a faciility utilized Universal Precautions in the handling of all soiled laundry, alternative labeling or color-coding of bags or containers was not used to permit all employees to recognize the containers as requiring compliance with Universal Precautions: 1) Alternative labeling or color-coding of bags or containers for potentially contaminated laundry was not used to permit all employees to recognize the containers as requiring compliance with Universal Precautions.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $714
- · Z (S) $1020
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 622110)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334905189.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.