EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: GATEWAY FABRICATORS INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GATEWAY FABRICATORS INC in 633 COLLINSVILLE AVENUE, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62201 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 334968989.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GATEWAY FABRICATORS INC
- Site address
- 633 COLLINSVILLE AVENUE
- City
- EAST SAINT LOUIS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62201
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2193, EAST SAINT LOUIS, IL 62201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331210
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Employees were exposed to caught in hazards while working around machines that are being repaired such as but not limited to the Accupress hydraulic press brake and the Flagler Cold Forming Machine. A LockOut/TagOut Program would address the hazards and steps to be taken for avoiding hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by ingoing nip points: In the Shop Area, east section, on the Flagler Corporation Cold Forming Machine, the ingoing nip points on the multiple rollers were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guard(s) were not provided where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet from the floor or working level: Shop Area, west side, on the pedestal fan, it did not have a guard on the front blade side, and the guard on the rear had opening several inches wide, exceeding the maximum inch opening allowed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): a) In the Shop Area, east section, on the Flagler Corporation Cold Forming Machine, the cover was missing from the electrical control box, 110 volts, on the east side of the machine. b) In the Shop Area, on a 110 volt pedestal fan, the rear endplate did not cover the exposed electrical wiring.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap: a) Shop Area, west side, the 110 volt extension cord was spliced into the flexible power cord for the Skilsaw, 7 ?inch portable saw. b) In the Shop Area, on a 110 volt pedestal fan, the power cord was spliced into the motors wiring.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket): Shop Area, on the orange 110 volt extension cord, it was in used supplying electricity to a pedestal fan, with damage/openings in its outer insulation. The outer insulation was pulled away from plug, allowing strain to be placed the inner electrical connectors.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): The employer had a Powered Industrial Vehicle Program, but had not certified that all operators were competent to run the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: A written Hazard Communications program regarding hazardous chemicals had not been developed to inform, protect and train employees on the chemicals hazards. Employees worked with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to automotive oils, brake fluid and hydraulic oil and were exposed to the hazards associated with those products.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: Material safety data sheets were not kept that would provide information in case of a medical emergency or condition if an employee ingested or contacted chemicals. Employees worked with hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to automotive oils, brake fluid, and hydraulic oil were exposed to the hazards associated with those products.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Employees had not been trained regarding the hazards related with using hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to automotive oils, brake fluid, and hydraulic oil were exposed to the hazards associated with those products.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Gateway Fabricators INC
View Gateway Fabricators INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331210)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334968989.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.