TULSA, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: GARNETT CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GARNETT CORPORATION in 7070 S. GARNETT, TULSA, OK 74133 (NAICS 332919). OSHA activity number 334984184.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GARNETT CORPORATION
- Site address
- 7070 S. GARNETT
- City
- TULSA
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74133
- Mailing
- 7070 S. GARNETT, TULSA, OK 74133
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332919
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about June 26, 2012, and at times prior there to, the employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training, and periodic inspections for employees performing maintenance on lathes and drill machines, exposing employees to struck by and caught in between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about June 26, 2012, and at times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that employees operating Toyota forklifts were properly trained and competent by completing training and evaluation required by paragraph (l), exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about June 26, 2012, and at times prior there to, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program which included the requirement for labeling, material safety and data sheets (MSDS), chemical inventory, and training for employees using hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, ECOCool SYN 1722.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332919)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 334984184.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.