Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PENN PERRY INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PENN PERRY INC. in 2205 EAST CARSON STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA 15203 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335001186.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Penn Perry INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Penn Perry INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PENN PERRY INC.
Site address
2205 EAST CARSON STREET
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15203
Mailing
75 SHENOT ROAD, WEXFORD, PA 15090
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $2,520
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that approrpriate fall protection systems/devices were used while workers were installing tiles to the side of a dormer on the front of the building in that the parapet wall surrounding this area was approximately 32 inches in height in at least one area, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2520

1926.501 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): Each employee in a hoist area was not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems:    a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection systems/devices were used while working at the hoisting area on the rear roof, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a) Job site, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities on roof with an approximate 7 in 12 pitch, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection systems/devices while installing roof hip sections where exposed to falls of up to approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,800
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1): The warning line was not erected around all sides of the roof work area:    a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that warning lines, used in some places for fall protection on the rear roof, were erected around the full roof area, including area by the chimney and the hoist. Guardrails that had been installed here were taken down and replaced by flags, which were also taken down and not replaced, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1800

1926.502 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i):  When mechanical equipment was not being used, the warning line was not erected not less than 6 feet (1.8 m) from the roof edge:    a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that warning lines, used in some places for fall protection on the rear roof, were at least 6 feet from the edge of the roof, exposing workers to falls of up to approximately 17 feet. It was determined that the flags ranged in distance from approximately 2-6 feet from the edge of the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(i): The rope, wire, or chain was not flagged at not more than 6-foot (1.8 m) intervals with high-visibility material:     a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that warning lines, used for fall protection on the rear roof, were highly visible in that the warning line was faded to a white color, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 17 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 F02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged and supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was no less than 34 inches (.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point is no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface:    a) Jobsite, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that warning lines, used for fall protection on the rear roof, were set up such that at it's lowest point, the flags were at least 34 inches above the surface of the roof, exposing employees to falls of up to approximately 17 feet. It was determined that the flags in some areas were between approximately 24-30" from the roofline.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): All lamps for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage:      a) Job site, 2205 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about June 27, 2012, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that bulb covers were present on temporary lighting systems. Employees were permitted to walk/work by a temporary lighting stand that had missing/broken bulb cover guards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Penn Perry INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335001186.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.