Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: RIVERBEND MASONRY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RIVERBEND MASONRY in EXETER TOWN HALL 10 FRONT ST., EXETER, NH 03833 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 335002382.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Riverbend Masonry for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Riverbend Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RIVERBEND MASONRY
Site address
EXETER TOWN HALL 10 FRONT ST.
City
EXETER
State
NH
ZIP
03833
Mailing
144 COURT ST., EXETER, NH 03833
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights.    a) Site- employees were not protected from falls of approximately 26 feet where the employer failed to fully plank the working surface of a tubular welded scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm).    a) Site- Employees were not protected from falls of approximately 23 feet when scaffold planks did not extend at least 6 inches over the support.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.     a) Site- employees were not protected from falls of approximately 34 feet when the side rails of a tubular welded scaffold were used to access upper and lower levels.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.    a) Site- Employees were not protected from falls of approximately 34 feet while performing painting work from a tubular welded scaffold when fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 10, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a) Site- Employees using a buildings ledge to move equipment were not protected from falls of approximately 26 feet when fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2012
Abate by
Aug 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    a) Site- Employees were working from a tubular welded scaffold in which one of the legs was resting on a small piece of wood and not a base plate or mud sill.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335002382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.