Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: TOM PRENTISS DBA PRENTISS CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TOM PRENTISS DBA PRENTISS CONSTRUCTION in 117 PINE STREET, MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, MA 01944 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 335008595.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TOM Prentiss DBA Prentiss Construction for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TOM Prentiss DBA Prentiss Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
117 PINE STREET
City
MANCHESTER BY THE SEA
State
MA
ZIP
01944
Mailing
67 FORREST AVE, ESSEX, MA 01929
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)    (a) Location - Pine Street, Manchester, MA:  On or about 4/13/12, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof greater than six feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    (a) Location - Pine Street, Manchester, MA:  On or about 4/13/12, employees were not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:    (a) Location - Pine Street, Manchester, MA:  On or about 4/13/12, a step ladder was used in the closed poistion.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335008595.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.