Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R. C. MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of R. C. MASONRY in 1061 BAYBERRY DRIVE, CANONSBURG, PA 15317 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 335058384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R. C. Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R. C. Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
R. C. MASONRY
Site address
1061 BAYBERRY DRIVE
City
CANONSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
15317
Mailing
184 BILL BROWN ROAD, PEMBROKE, GA 31321
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:        (a)Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was not wearing a protective helmet (hard hat) while he was working below another employee who was dismantling the tubular welded frame scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):     Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, an upright to the tubular welded frame scaffolding was bearing on nothing more than wooden planks.  There was nothing under the wooden planks to support them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):     When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was using the uprights and crossbracing to access different levels of the tubular welded frame scaffolding and to exit the scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F14

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(14):     Makeshift devices, such as but not limited to boxes and barrels, were used on top of scaffold platforms to increase the working level height of employees:        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was tearing down a tubular welded frame scaffold while he was standing on an upside down 5 gallon plastic bucket.  This employee was not protected from falling and the fall hazard was approxiamtely 20 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2):     The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds:        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was dismantling a tubular welded fram scaffold and the employee was not protected from falling.  The fall hazard to the ground was approxiamtely 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a):     The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, employees were working from a tubular welded frame scaffold and they were not trained by a qualified person to recognize hazards associated with the scaffolding and ways to control or minimize them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, the company did not have a hazardous communication program.  Employees work with Type N masonry cement which contains crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):     The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, employees are working with Type N Masonry cement and the company did not  have the material safety data sheet for Type N Masonry cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2012
Abate by
Aug 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h):     Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in        (a) Jobsite:  On or about June 25, 2012, employees were not trained in the safety hazards related to working with Type N Masonry Cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View R. C. Masonry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335058384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.