CANONSBURG, PA —
OSHA Inspection: R. C. MASONRY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of R. C. MASONRY in 1061 BAYBERRY DRIVE, CANONSBURG, PA 15317 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 335058384.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R. C. MASONRY
- Site address
- 1061 BAYBERRY DRIVE
- City
- CANONSBURG
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15317
- Mailing
- 184 BILL BROWN ROAD, PEMBROKE, GA 31321
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a)Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was not wearing a protective helmet (hard hat) while he was working below another employee who was dismantling the tubular welded frame scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, an upright to the tubular welded frame scaffolding was bearing on nothing more than wooden planks. There was nothing under the wooden planks to support them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was using the uprights and crossbracing to access different levels of the tubular welded frame scaffolding and to exit the scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F14
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(14): Makeshift devices, such as but not limited to boxes and barrels, were used on top of scaffold platforms to increase the working level height of employees: (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was tearing down a tubular welded frame scaffold while he was standing on an upside down 5 gallon plastic bucket. This employee was not protected from falling and the fall hazard was approxiamtely 20 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, an employee was dismantling a tubular welded fram scaffold and the employee was not protected from falling. The fall hazard to the ground was approxiamtely 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, employees were working from a tubular welded frame scaffold and they were not trained by a qualified person to recognize hazards associated with the scaffolding and ways to control or minimize them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, the company did not have a hazardous communication program. Employees work with Type N masonry cement which contains crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, employees are working with Type N Masonry cement and the company did not have the material safety data sheet for Type N Masonry cement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in (a) Jobsite: On or about June 25, 2012, employees were not trained in the safety hazards related to working with Type N Masonry Cement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at R. C. Masonry
View R. C. Masonry's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335058384.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.