RICHARDSON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: HARRISON HOIST, INC.
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of HARRISON HOIST, INC. in 800 W. CAMPBELL RD., RICHARDSON, TX 75080 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 335082194.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARRISON HOIST, INC.
- Site address
- 800 W. CAMPBELL RD.
- City
- RICHARDSON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75080
- Mailing
- 105 KEYSTONE DRIVE, TELFORD, PA 18969
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1404 H12
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 19126.1404(h)(12): The A/D director supervising the assembly/disassembly operation did not address the hazards associated with the operation, including the effect of wind speed and weather on the equipment: The A/D director, who supervises the disassembly operation, does not address the hazards associated with wind loads and weather on the equipment. This violation occurred on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the A/D director, who was supervising the disassembly of the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane (11 tower sections high), did not address the hazards associated with wind loads and weather on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1406 A01
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1406(a)(1): When employer procedures were used instead of manufacturer procedures for assembly/disassembly, the employer did not ensure that the procedures prevented unintended dangerous movement, and prevented collapse, of any part of the equipment: When using employer procedures instead of manufacturer procedures for disassembly, the employer does not ensure that the procedures prevent unintended dangerous movement, and prevent collapse, of any part of the crane. This violation occurred on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the employers' procedures for disassembling the mast to the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane (11 tower sections high) by removing up to six of the eight connecting elements (mast bolts) from every other tower section did not prevent unintended dangerous movement and collapse of the mast.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3920
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1406 A02
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1406(a)(2): When employer procedures were used instead of manufacturer procedures for assembly/disassembly, the employer did not ensure that the procedures provided adequate support and stability of all parts of the equipment: When using employer procedures instead of manufacturer procedures for disassembly, the employer does ensure that the procedures provide adequate support and stability of all parts of the tower crane. This violation occurred on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the employers procedures for disassembling the mast to the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane (11 tower sections high) by removing up to six of the eight connecting elements (mast bolts) from every other tower section did not provide adequate support and stability to the mast.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3920
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1406 A03
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1406(a)(3): When employer procedures were used instead of manufacturer procedures for assembly/disassembly, the employer did not ensure that the procedures positioned employees involved in the assembly/disassembly operation so that their exposure to unintended movement or collapse of part or all of the equipment was minimized: When using employer procedures instead of manufacturer procedures for disassembly, the employer does ensure that the procedures position employees so that their exposure to unintended movement or collapse of the crane is minimized. This violation occurred on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the employers procedures for disassembling the mast to the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane (11 tower sections high) by removing up to six of the eight connecting elements (mast bolts) from every other tower section while two employees remained on the mast rigging parts and sections did not position the two employees so that their exposure to unintended movement or collapse of the crane was minimized.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1406 B
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1406(b): Employer procedures were not developed by a qualified person: The employer does not ensure that procedures for disassembling tower cranes are developed by a qualified person. This violation occurred on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the employers procedures for disassembling the mast to the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane (11 tower sections high) by removing up to six of the eight connecting elements (mast bolts) from every other tower section were not developed by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3920
- · Z (S) $4900
1926.1430 D
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1430(d): The employer did not train each competent person and each qualified person regarding the requirements of 29 CFR 1926 Subpart CC, Cranes and Derricks in Construction applicable to their respective roles: The employer does not train each competent person and each qualified person regarding the requirements of 29 CFR 1926 Subpart CC, Cranes and Derricks in Construction applicable to their respective roles. This violation was discovered on July 7, 2012, at a workplace located at 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas; where the employer did not train each competent person and qualified person for the Terex Peiner, model SK 415, tower crane on the requirements of 29 CFR 1926 Subpart CC, Cranes and Derricks in Construction that were applicable to their respective roles.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3920
- · Z (S) $4900
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335082194.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.