WILLIAMSVILLE, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: DANE TANEVSKI DBA DT PAINTING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANE TANEVSKI DBA DT PAINTING in 8210 MAIN STREET, WILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 335099586.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANE TANEVSKI DBA DT PAINTING
- Site address
- 8210 MAIN STREET
- City
- WILLIAMSVILLE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14221
- Mailing
- 4937 MILESTRIP ROAD, BLASDELL, NY 14219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary. a) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: Two employees doing painting work while working from the top level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold were exposed to a fall of approx. 10 ft. 11 in. because the level was not fully planked. The width of the scaffold was 60 inches, and there were only three approx. 12 in. wide wood planks in place instead of the five required. b) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: One employee doing painting work while working from the middle level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold was exposed to a fall of approx. 8 ft. 5 in. because the level was not fully planked. The width of the scaffold was 60 inches, and there was only one approx. 12 in. wide wood plank in place instead of the five required. c) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: One employee doing painting work while working from the lower level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold was exposed to a fall of approx. 6 ft. 6 in. because the level was not fully planked. The width of the scaffold was 60 inches, and there was only one approx. 12 in. wide wood plank in place instead of the five required. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $400
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. a) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: Employees were exposed to potential fall of up to 10 ft. 11 in. while accessing the top level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold by climbing the end frame of the scaffold. No ladder was provided. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $400
- · C (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: Two employees doing painting work while working from the top level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold were exposed to a fall of approx. 10 ft. 11 in. off the south side of the scaffold because no guardrail or other fall protection system was utilized. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $400
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training shall include the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards, and falling object hazards in the work area: a) On or about 07/02/12, on construction site at 8210 Main St., Williamsville, NY: Two employees doing painting work while working from the top level of a mobile fabricated frame scaffold were exposed to a fall of approx. 10 ft. 11 inches. The employees were not trained about the nature of fall hazards associated with working from this type of scaffold, the pertinent OSHA scaffolding regulations, and the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $400
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335099586.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.