BROOKFIELD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: GIL-DEN INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GIL-DEN INC. in 578 FEDERAL ROAD, BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 335144580.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GIL-DEN INC.
- Site address
- 578 FEDERAL ROAD
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06804
- Mailing
- 82 MIDDLEBORO ROAD, EAST FREETOWN, MA 02717
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Worksite: An employee was working in an excavation that was approximately 7 feet 5 inches deep without a ladder or other safe means of egress in place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the excavation was inspected by a competent person prior to allowing employees to enter the excavation and begin work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that spoil piles and other excavated materials were kept at least two feet from the edge of the excavation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). Worksite: An employee was working in an excavation that was approximately 7 feet 5 inches deep without any form of cave in protection in place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Gil-Den INC.
View Gil-Den INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335144580.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.