SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN in 208 WESTBROOK, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62704 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335182382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN
- Site address
- 208 WESTBROOK
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62704
- Mailing
- 10721 OLD ROUTE 66, GLENARM, IL 62536
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while installing roofing material and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while installing roofing material and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the eye without eye protection while using pneumatic nail gun on a residential construction site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to approximately 14 feet while installing roofing material and no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards which enables each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards: Employees installing roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard approximately 14 feet and the employees were not provided training which would have enabled them to recognize the hazards of falling and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 8 feet when using a ladder to access the roof and the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335182382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.