MEREDITH, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: GRACEFUL WINDS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRACEFUL WINDS, INC. in 3 MILL ST., MEREDITH, NH 03253 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 335200382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GRACEFUL WINDS, INC.
- Site address
- 3 MILL ST.
- City
- MEREDITH
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03253
- Mailing
- 105 MERIDETH CENTER RD., MEREDITH, NH 03253
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employee, working on the roof without fall protection, was not trained in the recognition of fall hazards or the procedures to control them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.503 C
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section: Jobsite: The employee, working on the roof and exposed to the hazard of falling, was not adequately trained to identify the fall hazards he was exposed to or the procedures to control or minimize them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, that enabled each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize those hazards: Jobsite: The employee, accessing the roof via the aluminum extension ladder, was not trained in the recognition of ladder hazards or the procedures necessary to control them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1060 B
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(b): The employer did not provide retraining as necessary for each employee using ladders and stairways so that the employee maintained the understanding and knowledge acquired through prior training: Jobsite: The employee, accessing the roof via the aluminum extension ladder, was not retrained to identify the hazards related to ladders he was exposed to or the procedures to control or minimize them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. Jobsite: The employees, engaged in framing and roofing activities on the roof of the building, were not protected from the hazard of falling lower levels.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The siderails of the ladder, used by the employees to access the roof, did not extend three feet beyond the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335200382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.