Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JDI CONSTRUCTION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JDI CONSTRUCTION in 33 STIMSON AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02906 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 335240982.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JDI Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JDI Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JDI CONSTRUCTION
Site address
33 STIMSON AVENUE
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02906
Mailing
1655 FALL RIVER AVENUE, #4, SEEKONK, MA 02771
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1):     Each scaffold and/or scaffold component was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it:    a.  Jobsite:  On or about July, 11, 2012, an employee was injured when the chimney roof bracket failed to support at least 4 times the maximum intended load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $250
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1):     Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph:    a.  Jobsite:  The scaffold was not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing or equivalent means.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):     When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    a.  Jobsite:  Employees were not provided with ladders or equivalent when accessing the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):     Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    a.  Jobsite:  On or about July 11, 2012, an employee working from the chimney roof bracket fell to the ground.  The employee was not provided with adequate fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 2, 2012
Abate by
Oct 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a):     The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    a.  Jobsite:  The employer did not have a qualified person train each employee to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View JDI Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335240982.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.