Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: BEARD OIL COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BEARD OIL COMPANY in 6600 N Q STREET, BRAMAN, OK 74632 (NAICS 211111). OSHA activity number 335264982.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Beard OIL Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Beard OIL Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BEARD OIL COMPANY
Site address
6600 N Q STREET
City
BRAMAN
State
OK
ZIP
74632
Mailing
521 W WILSHIRE BLVD STE 120, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73116
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
211111
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each portable fire extinguisher was mounted so that it was readily accessible to employees without subjecting them to possible injury:    South battery by field office: On July 16, 2012, the employer did not ensure that each fire extinguisher provided for employee use was mounted exposing employees to the hazard of fire.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.157 C04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4):  The employer did not ensure that each portable fire extinguisher maintained in a fully charged and operable condition:    South battery by field office: On July 16, 2012, employees were exposed to the hazard of fire created by a fire extinguisher provided for employee use not being fully charged.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2):  The employer did not ensure that each portable fire extinguisher was inspected monthly:    South battery by field office: On July 16, 2012, employees were exposed to the hazard of fire created by a fire extinguisher provided for employee use not being inspected monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment:    Entire Facility: On or about July 16, 2012, employees that are exposed to hazardous chemicals while operating and maintaining equipment in the oil field have not received effective information and training for the chemicals used in the work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    Entire facility:  On or about July 16, 2012, the employer had not certified in writing the PPE (personal protective equipment) hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(ii): The employer did not retain fit test records for respirator users:    Dilworth Oil Field: On or about July 16, 2012, the employer did not maintain fit test records for employees using respiratory protection such as, but not limited to, SCBAs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 M04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(4): The employer did not ensure that a copy of the written Respiratory Protection Program was available to the Assistant Secretary and the Director:    Entire Facility: On July 16, 2012, the employer did not provide a copy of the written Respiratory Protection program being used at the time of the initial inspection to the Compliance Officer as requested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1020 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 29, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(d)(1)(i): The medical record for each employee shall be preserved and maintained for at least the duration of employment plus thirty (30) years:    Oil Field: On or about July 16, 2012, the employer did not maintain copies of respiratory protection medical determination for employees using respiratory protection such as, but not limited to, SCBAs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(4):  The employer did not ensure that the written hazard communication program was made available, upon request, to the Assistant Secretary and the Director:    Entire Facility: On July 16, 2012, the employer did not provide a copy of the written Hazard Communication program that was on site at the time of the initial inspection to the Compliance Officer as requested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G11

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2012
Abate by
Nov 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(11):  The employer did not ensure that Material Safety Data Sheets were made available, upon request, to the Assistant Secretary and the Director:    Entire Facility: On July 16, 2012, the employer did not provide a copy of Material Safety Data Sheets that were on site at the time of the initial inspection to the Compliance Officer as requested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335264982.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.