Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MENDEL STEEL & ORNAMENTAL IRON COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MENDEL STEEL & ORNAMENTAL IRON COMPANY in 3017 SOUTH PARK ROAD, BETHEL PARK, PA 15102 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 335273389.

Watch Mendel Steel & Ornamental Iron Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mendel Steel & Ornamental Iron Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3017 SOUTH PARK ROAD
City
BETHEL PARK
State
PA
ZIP
15102
Mailing
3017 SOUTH PARK ROAD, BETHEL PARK, PA 15102
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $804.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer:    a) At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 -  The employer requires employees to wear a Freedom half-mask 231P95 respirator while applying Pratt & Lambert Alkyd Shopcoat Grey Primer using an Ultimate Nova 395 electric airless sprayer.  The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $804
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 - An employee required to wear a Freedom half-mask 231P95 respirator while applying Pratt & Lambert Alkyd Shopcoat Grey Primer using an Ultimate Nova 395 electric airless sprayer did not receive a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    a)  At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 - An employee required to wear a Freedom half-mask 231P95 respirator while applying Pratt & Lambert Alkyd Shopcoat Grey Primer using an Ultimate Nova 395 electric airless sprayer did not receive a qualitative or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):    a) At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 - An employee welding on stainless steel did not have his 8-hour time-weighted average for hexavalent chromium determined by the employer.  The employee had an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure of 5.0917 �g of hexavalent chromium per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1026 L02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A):  The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026:    a) At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 - An employee welding on stainless steel could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of 29 CFR 1910.1026.  The employee had an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure of 5.0917 micrograms of hexavalent chromium per cubic meter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    a) At the facility, on or about July 18, 2012 -  Employees apply Pratt & Lambert Alkyd Shopcoat Grey Primer using an Ultimate Nova 395 electric airless sprayer to fabricated rails.  Pratt & Lambert Alkyd Shopcoat Grey Primer contains V. M. & P. Naphtha.  The employer did not establish a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335273389.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.