IRVING, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN STUD WELD, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SOUTHERN STUD WELD, INC. in 3645 CONFLANS ROAD, IRVING, TX 75061 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 335273595.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTHERN STUD WELD, INC.
- Site address
- 3645 CONFLANS ROAD
- City
- IRVING
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75061
- Mailing
- 3645 CONFLANS ROAD, IRVING, TX 75061
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated, and rendered inoperative in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4): On or about May 4, 2012 and times prior therto, the employer had not developed an energy control program for employees who performed servicing and maintenance work on equipment and machinery and were not protected from the unexpected energizing, start up or release or stored energy.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated an Ohio Forge drill press that did not have a guard installed to protect employees from rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1080
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Jet vertical milling machine that did not have a point of operation guard installed to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1080
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.217 B03 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(3)(i): Mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches did not incorporate a single-stroke mechanism: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press that did not have a single-stroke mechanism installed to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.217 B04 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(4)(i): Pedal mechanism(s) on mechanical power press(es) full revolution clutches were not protected to prevent unintended operation from falling or moving objects or by accidental stepping onto the pedals: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press that did not have a guard installed over foot pedal mechanism to prevent un-intended or accidental operation of the machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.217 B04 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(4)(ii): Mechanical power press(es) using full revolution clutches were not provided with a pad with a non-slip contact area firmly attached to the pedal: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press that did not have a non-slip type pad attached to the foot pedal mechanism to protect employees from un-intended operation of the machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.217 B08 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(8)(ii): Motor start button(s) of mechanical power press(es) were not protected against accidental operation: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press that did not have the motor start buttons protected against accidental operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, employees operated a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press that did not have a point of operation guard or point of operation device installed to provent employees hands and fingers from entering press during operating cycle.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.217 E01 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): Records of mechanical power press inspections and the maintenance work performed were not maintained: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain records of inspections and maintenance work performed on a Robinson A4 full revolution mechanical power press used by employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about July 16, 2012 and times prior thereto, the employer had not developed a program for employees who used hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to Safety-Kleen parts washing solvent, oils, lubrications, and coolants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335273595.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.