OVERLAND PARK, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: LASER APPAREL, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LASER APPAREL, LLC in 9105 CODY ST, OVERLAND PARK, KS 66214 (NAICS 323113). OSHA activity number 335275392.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LASER APPAREL, LLC
- Site address
- 9105 CODY ST
- City
- OVERLAND PARK
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66214
- Mailing
- 9105 CODY ST, OVERLAND PARK, KS 66214
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323113
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: Employees working in the Screen Room were exposed to injury from contact with hazardous chemicals. Employees had not been trained to use the appropriate gloves to prevent skin exposure to corrosive chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Employees working in the Screen Room were exposed to eye injury. Eye or face protection was not provided to employees at the screen cleaning booth using hazardous chemicals and high pressure spray cleaning methods.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.141 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(ii): Where wet processes were used, drainage was not maintained and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places were not provided, where practicable: Employees were exposed to injury from a slipping hazard in and around the Screen Room. The floor around the screen cleaning process and around the sink area adjacent to the Screen Room were not maintained in a dry condition. Mats were not provided, and all employees working in the area were not provided with slip resistant foot ware.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Employees working in the Screen Rom were exposed to eye and skin injury. The employer had not provided quick drenching facilities for employees that use corrosive chemicals such as IMS602 Stencil Remover Concentrate and IMS903 Purecoat Ultimate SBQ Emulsion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Employees working in the screen room were exposed to injury from hazardous chemicals. The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program describing container labeling, material safety data sheets, and information and training. Hazardous chemicals included but were not limited to IMS602 Stencil Remover Concentrate, Rutland Screen Printing Plastisol, and IMS903 Purecoat Ultimate SBQ Emulsion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 2, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets. Employees working in the Screen Room were exposed to injury and illness in that they had not been provided information and training on the hazardous chemicals with which they work. Hazardous chemicals included but were not limited to IMS602 Stencil Remover Concentrate, Rutland Screen Printing Plastisol, and IMS903 Purecoat Ultimate SBQ Emulsion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Laser Apparel, LLC
View Laser Apparel, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323113)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335275392.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.