LA PORTE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: COSENTINO CENTER - HOUSTON
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of COSENTINO CENTER - HOUSTON in 1921 SOUTH 16TH STREET, LA PORTE, TX 77571 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 335290383.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COSENTINO CENTER - HOUSTON
- Site address
- 1921 SOUTH 16TH STREET
- City
- LA PORTE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77571
- Mailing
- 13124 TRINITY DRIVE, STAFFORD, TX 77477
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493110
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were operating a Doosan forklift model G25E serial number 5778828 on the warehouse floor and was not wearing a seatbelt, exposing himself to being crushed if forklift turns over. b. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were operating a Cat forklift model PD 11000 Serial number AT28C50317 on the warehouse floor and was not wearing a seatbelt, exposing himself to being crushed if forklift turns over.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affected capacity and safe operation were performed by the customer or user without manufacturers written approval, and the capacity, operation and maintenance instruction plates, tags or decals were not changed accordingly a. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were using lift master booms on a Doosan forklift without manufactures written approval, or certification by a professional registered engineer, exposing employees to struck-by and caught-in-between hazards. b. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were using lift master booms on a Cat forklift without manufactures written approval, or certification by a professional registered engineer, exposing employees to struck-by and caught-in-between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Where powered industrial trucks were found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the trucks were not taken out of service until they had been restored to safe operating condition. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a forklift that had damage and needed repair to fix an unsafe condition, exposing employees to injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were using a forklift that had not been examined before use, exposing employees to injuries from defective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.184 F05 III
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(f)(5)(iii): Wire rope sling(s) that had kinking, crushing, bird caging or other damage resulting in distortion of the wire rope structure were not immediately removed from service: In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees were using wire rope slings that damaged, and were exposed struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Dec 10, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Each day before being used, the sling and all fastenings and attachments were not being inspected for damage or defects by a competent person designated by the employer: In the warehouse, on July 17, 2012, and at times prior thereto; employees working in the warehouse were using wire rope slings used to lift granite slabs were not inspected before use, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335290383.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.