Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CROSSFIRE LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CROSSFIRE LLC in 35191 HWY 160, BAYFIELD, CO 81122 (NAICS 211111). OSHA activity number 335310389.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Crossfire LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Crossfire LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CROSSFIRE LLC
Site address
35191 HWY 160
City
BAYFIELD
State
CO
ZIP
81122
Mailing
P.O. BOX 339, IGNACIO, CO 81137
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
211111
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards:    a)  On or about June 25, 2012, Crossfire LLC did not ensure that employees were protected from struck-by hazards while performing purging operations on a 16 inch pipeline.  Nitrogen was being introduced into a pig launcher vessel attached to the pipeline at high pressure. The 16 inch trap isolation valve was left in the closed position which led to a fast build-up of nitrogen in the vessel above the maximum allowable working pressure.  The vessel ruptured due to over-pressurization.    The following deficiencies were found with this process:    1. Procedures for performing purging operations were not followed nor was there a verification or oversight process in place to ensure that all valves in the entire process (from pumping unit to receiver) were in the proper positions prior to initiating the purging process.    2. The pig launcher vessel and associated equipment used in this process were not provided with effective overpressure protection when the potential for over-pressurization existed.    3. An effective system was not used to monitor, verify and record the pressure in the pig launcher vessel and the pipeline during purging.    4. Effective communication methods between all affected parties were not established and utilized for the purging process.    Abatement Note: Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards during purging operations would be to follow ASME B31.8-2010 sections 845 and 850 as well as 49 CFR 192.  Other more specific methods include but are not limited to:     1) Modify and improve written operating procedures for pipeline purging, pigging and similar operations to include but not be limited to a detailed list of specific valve opening and closing locations, the sequence of which valves to open and close and the inspection of each location to ensure it is in the proper position.     2) Implement a verification, inspection and oversight process for purging and pigging operations to ensure that all operating procedures are followed properly and valves and other critical components are in the proper positions and at appropriate settings.    3) Train all affected employees and contractors who will be performing purging and pigging operations on new procedures.     4) Establish clear and consistent communication methods for purging and pigging operations to be reviewed and coordinated with all affected parties.    5) Ensure that appropriately designed/and sized overpressure protective devices/systems are provided, installed and set up properly for this type of equipment.  The overpressure protection system must inspected, tested and maintained so it will function effectively in the event of an over-pressure situation.      6)  Ensure that gauges used to monitor pressure in the system during purging and pigging are properly designed and suited for the system under the conditions of use.      7)  Perform process hazard analysis on this system and similar systems and equipment to identify potential failure modes and preventative measures for these.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

View Crossfire LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335310389.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.