Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALLPINE LUMBER CO.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ALLPINE LUMBER CO. in 19456 CTY RD 17.2, LA JARA, CO 81140 (NAICS 321113). OSHA activity number 335337994.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Allpine Lumber CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allpine Lumber CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALLPINE LUMBER CO.
Site address
19456 CTY RD 17.2
City
LA JARA
State
CO
ZIP
81140
Mailing
19456 CTY RD 17.2, LA JARA, CO 81140
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321113
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2012
Abate by
Sep 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):  The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent:    a)  On or about June 14, 2011 and at times prior, the employer did not protect the hearing of employees by developing and implementing a hearing conservation program which included initial noise monitoring, baseline and annual audiograms, and employee training for employees that worked in the sawmill and planer areas.  Employees working in these areas were exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level of greater than 85dBA (50% dose).      On July 20, 2012, the following employees were exposed to the following:           1.  An employee working in the sawmill area was exposed to noise at a level of 95.4 dBA (98.5% dose) for a 3 hour and 43 miinute monitoring period.             2.  An employee working in the planer area was exposed to noise at a level of 99.5 dBA (181.5% dose) for a 3 hour and 54 minute monitoring period.           3.  An employee working in the sawmill area was exposed to noise at a level of 94.2 dbA (92.5% dose) for a 4 hour and 7 minute period.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2012
Abate by
Aug 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a)  On or about July 20, 2012, and at times prior, employees performing maintenance work were exposed to amputation, struck by, and caught between injures from the following equipment:        1.  Resaw      2.  Hog      3.  Edger      4.  Sawdust Chain      5.  Head Rig    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed Sample Abatement-Certification Letter).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2012
Abate by
Aug 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about July 20, 2012, and at times prior, employees were exposed to amputation hazards from working with/around the following equipment:       1.  Un-guarded rotating shaft on the planer feeder bin.       2.  Un-guarded rotating roller on the planer feeder area.       3.  Un-guarded rotating shaft on the electrical motor powering the dust extractor.       4.  Un-guarded saw in the saw mill.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed Sample Abatement-Certification Letter).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335337994.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.