DRYDEN, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: A-1 FAMILY RESTAURANT AND PIZZERIA
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of A-1 FAMILY RESTAURANT AND PIZZERIA in 151 STATE HIGHWAY 13, DRYDEN, NY 13053 (NAICS 722110). OSHA activity number 335344586.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-1 FAMILY RESTAURANT AND PIZZERIA
- Site address
- 151 STATE HIGHWAY 13
- City
- DRYDEN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13053
- Mailing
- 151 STATE HIGHWAY 13, DRYDEN, NY 13053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722110
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1001 D02 I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring of employees who were, or might reasonably be expected to be exposed to airborne concentrations at or above the 8-hour TWA and/or excursion limits: Note: The employer that does not meet either of the exceptions presented at 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(ii) and 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(iii) must comply with 29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i). (a) At the facility basement, on or about 7/23/2012: The employer performed no monitoring for kitchen workers who obtained equipment and supplies stored below the poor condition friable duct insulation comprised of 60% Chrysotile asbestos. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1001 J02 I
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9954
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(2)(i): The building owner or facility owner did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and/or other asbestos-containing material (ACM) at the work site: (a) At the facility basement, on or about 7/23/2012: The employer did not determine the presence and location of asbestos containing duct insulation comprised of 60% Chrysotile asbestos. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) At the facility, on or about 7/23/2012: The employer had no written hazard communication program where kitchen workers were exposed to corrosive bleach and irritant chemical disinfectant products. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 G
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical: (a) At the facility, on or about 7/23/2012: The employer had no material safety data sheets where kitchen workers were exposed to corrosive bleach and irritant chemical disinfectant products. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 27, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) At the facility, on or about 7/23/2012: The employer had not trained kitchen workers about hazardous chemicals and how to access information about corrosive bleach and irritant chemical disinfectant products they used. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722110)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335344586.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.