SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: SERVCO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SERVCO EQUIPMENT COMPANY in 3189 JAMIESON AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63139 (NAICS 333319). OSHA activity number 335418034.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SERVCO EQUIPMENT COMPANY
- Site address
- 3189 JAMIESON AVENUE
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63139
- Mailing
- 3189 JAMIESON AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63139
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333319
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(i) through (v)), on all open sides: Dock area: Employees were exposed to fall hazards where the dock used by employees for shipping and receiving purposes was not guarded where it was higher than 48 inches from the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: Plant: A lockout/tagout program was not instituted to protect employees who performed servicing and repairs on machines such as, but not limited to, iron workers, brakes, and mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years: Plant: Operators of forklifts did not receive required performance evaluation in over three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rorating edges: Assembly area: A Milwauke chop saw used for non-wood products had a non-fuctioning guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1): The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of radial saw(s) were not guarded to the full diameter of the blade by a device that automatically adjusted itself to the thickness of the stock and remained in contact with the machine: Crating: The guard on a radial saw, used strictly for wood products, did not cover the full diameter of the blade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4): Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator: Crating area: A Multiplex B-62 radial saw did not return to its starting position when relased.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): Shop: A mechanical power press, did not have a guard to prevent operator's hands or fingers from getting into the point of operation zone.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $890 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Polishing area: Spoked pulley of a Wheel-Set-Up machine 41 5/8 inches from the workplace floor was not guarded to prevent injuries to the operator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $890
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): Polishing area: Belt of an inclined Wheel-Set-Up machine, which was 41 5/8 inches from the workplace floor, was not guarded to prevent injuries to the operator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B07 IV
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): Electrical equipment had damaged parts such as broken parts, bent parts, cut parts, or deteriorated parts, which could adversely affect safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment: Assembly area: Duplex receptacle box had a broken ground pin lodged in the upper receptacle.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Polishing area: Hand polishing equipment with exposed live parts was not covered to prevent employee injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
More inspections at Servco Equipment Company
View Servco Equipment Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333319)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335418034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.