Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NORPAK CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NORPAK CORPORATION in 70 BLANCHARD ST., NEWARK, NJ 07105 (NAICS 322221). OSHA activity number 335429403.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Norpak Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Norpak Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NORPAK CORPORATION
Site address
70 BLANCHARD ST.
City
NEWARK
State
NJ
ZIP
07105
Mailing
70 BLANCHARD ST., NEWARK, NJ 07105
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322221
Employees
39
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.38 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 39 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(b):  An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    a) Establishment      The employer did not have a written emergency action plan for their thirty-nine employees' review.        Violation was observed on or about 07/31/2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B):  Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:      a) Establishment      The employer did not provide training to machine operators who may be affected due to the servicing of machines, such as, but not limited to, the IWS machine.        Violation was observed on or about 07/31/2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1875
  • — C (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):  Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)      a) Establishment/Production shop      The latch to secure the propane tank to Datsun forklift (serial Number A25V) was defective.          Violation was observed on or about 07//25/2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1875
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Sep 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b):  Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:      a) Shop area      Compressed air used to clean the paper residue and machine parts of Pasaban machine and IWS machine were 60 psi.        Violation was observed on or about 07/31/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1875
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,875 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not implement and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      a) Establishment      Employees handling liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) containers and operating the LPG powered forklift trucks were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, propane. The employer did no implement the written hazard communication program.           Violation was observed on or about 07/31/2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1875
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:      a) Establishment      The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for compressed liquids and gases, such as, but not limited to liquefied petroleum gases (propane).           Violation was observed on or about  07/31/2012
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) Establishment      Employees handling liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) containers and operating the LPG powered forklift trucks were exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, propane. The employer did not provide hazard communication training.        Violation was observed on or about 07/31/2012.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Norpak Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335429403.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.