ALPHARETTA, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: SALVADOR GAMBOA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SALVADOR GAMBOA in 1125 FOWLERS SPRING COURT, ALPHARETTA, GA 30004 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 335449211.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SALVADOR GAMBOA
- Site address
- 1125 FOWLERS SPRING COURT
- City
- ALPHARETTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30004
- Mailing
- 3114 GROVE CIRCLE, HAPEVILLE, GA 30354
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) On or about June 26, 2012: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13.6 feet while utilizing a working level stacking brick materials, on a scaffold system that was not fully planked between the front uprights and guardrail posts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. End frames were used as a means of access. On or about June 26, 2012: Employees were exposed to fall hazarrds of approximately 13.6 feet while accessing a scaffoold working area without the use of ladder or other acceptable means, employees were utilizing the end frames to gain access.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about June 26, 2012: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of the following: a) Employee standing on top section of scaffold catching and stacking brick materials was exposed to fall of approximately 13.6 feet. b) Employees standing and working on an outrigger portion of scaffold system were exposed to falls of approximately 12.6 feet when no end rails were installed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about June 26, 2012: An employee was exposeed to struck by hazards from brick materials that were stacked upon the top of scaffold system at a height of 13.6 feet, when working below the scaffold without wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall. On or about June 26, 2012: Employee was exposeed to struck by hazards from brick materials that were stacked upon the top of scaffold system at a height of 13.6 feet, when owner was not utilizing additional protection to protect employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335449211.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.