SAN JOSE, CA —
OSHA Inspection: CHANDLER PACKAGING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHANDLER PACKAGING, INC. in 520 N. MARBURG WAY, SAN JOSE, CA 95133 (NAICS 561910). OSHA activity number 335466793.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHANDLER PACKAGING, INC.
- Site address
- 520 N. MARBURG WAY
- City
- SAN JOSE
- State
- CA
- ZIP
- 95133
- Mailing
- 19752 COUNTY ROAD 24, FOLEY, AL 36535
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561910
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides and railings were not provided with a toeboard where required: a) Wooden containers: On or about July 25, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees working from on top of the containers were protected from falls up to 4.5-feet to the concrete below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Paint area near the northeast corner of the facility: On or about July 25, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure medical evaluations were conducted which exposed employees to health hazards associated with the use of a half face piece respirator with cartrigdes during painting operations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Paint area near the northeast corner of the facility: On or about July 25, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure fit testing was conducted which exposed employees to health hazards assoicated with the use of a half face piece respirator with cartrigdes during painting operations.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) Paint station located in the northeast corner of the facility: On or about July 25, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide or require clean storage for half face respirators in between use which exposed employees to health hazards associated with faulty and/or defective respiratory protection gear.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.334 A03 II
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(3)(ii): Attachment plugs and receptacles were connected or altered in a manner which prevented proper continuity of the electric equipment grounding conductor at the point where plugs were attached to receptacles: a) Assembly area: On or about July 25, 2012 and at time prior thereto, the employer did not ensure provided extension cords had the required grounding prongs which exposed employees to being electrically shocked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): Certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: a) Forklifts: On or about July 25, 2012 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain written certification of forklift operator training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Chandler Packaging, INC.
View Chandler Packaging, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561910)
More inspections in CA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335466793.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.