WARREN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: HAGEFEN PROPERTIES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HAGEFEN PROPERTIES in 1006 HARVARD DRIVE SE, WARREN, OH 44484 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 335467403.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAGEFEN PROPERTIES
- Site address
- 1006 HARVARD DRIVE SE
- City
- WARREN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44484
- Mailing
- 23366 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE #210, BEACHWOOD, OH 44122
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531311
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered A) On or about July 30th, 2012, the employer did not select and require employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to chlorine and other pool additives, with gloves, and splash resistant apron. B) On or about July 30th, 2012, the employer did not select and require employees exposed to falls greater than 4 feet with personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (4)
- — F (S) $2500
- — F (S) $2500
- — C (S) $3500
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: On or about July 30th, 2012, the employer did not have a written certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (4)
- — F (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: The employer did not have an emergency eyewash station that was available for immediate use where employees had exposure to corrosives and hazardous chemicals when addidng additives to the pool, on or about July 30, 2012.
Recent events (4)
- — F (S) $2500
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2800
1910.333 B02
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2):
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2500
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): On or about July 30, 2012 the key cutting machine located in the maintenence storage office area was not adequately guarded to protect the employee from the pulley.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met At the time of inspection the employer did not have a written hazard communication program and employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to; Chlorine, oils, lubricants, , and solvents.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Hagefen Properties
View Hagefen Properties's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531311)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335467403.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.