Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: TSAY/FERGUSON WILLIAMS LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of TSAY/FERGUSON WILLIAMS LLC in BUILDING 2226 1ST STREET, FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO 65473 (NAICS 531312). OSHA activity number 335488987.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tsay/Ferguson Williams LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tsay/Ferguson Williams LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BUILDING 2226 1ST STREET
City
FORT LEONARD WOOD
State
MO
ZIP
65473
Mailing
P. O. BOX 950, FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO 65473
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531312
Employees
193
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(8):     Every floor hole into which persons can accidentally walk were not guarded:    (a) At the waste water treatment area holes in grated walk areas were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.23 C03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(3):     Regardless of height, open-sided floors, walkways, platforms, or runways above or adjacent to dangerous equipment, pickling or galvanizing tanks, degreasing units, and similar hazards were not guarded with a standard railing and toe board.    (a) Two winches were located outside of a guardrail where operation of the winches exposed workers to multiple hazards including falls into waste water tanks were not adequately guarded for safe operation of the winches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.95 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1):     When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:      (a) Where working conditions had changed and loud noises were present in the work area, the employer had not assessed the area for worker exposure to noise.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.141 D03 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(3)(iv):     Showers were not provided with hot and cold water feeding a common discharge line:    (a) The shower at the waste water treatment area was not provided with tepid water.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.146 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2):     The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:    (a) At the boiler house, employees were not informed of the existence and location of permit spaces by posting danger signs or by other equally effective means.  Signs were not posted on or beside each of the two boilers;    (b) In the attic of Building 630 the air handling unit was not labeled as a permit required confined space by posting danger signs or by other equally effective means;    (c) At the waste water treatment facility, employees were not informed of the existence and location of all permit spaces by posting danger signs or by other equally effective means.  Signs were not posted at all tanks where mechanical equipment and or other hazards were present in the tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.146 D03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3):     Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations:    (a) On or about October 12, 2012 workers entered a permit-required confined space without implementing the procedures and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.146 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1):     Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit:    (a) On or about October 12, 2012 entry was made into a confined space and an entry permit had not been prepared and documented.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i):     Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    (a) On or about October 12, 2012 two workers entered a confined space where electrical hazards were present and locks were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees prior to entry and commensing work on the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.179 J03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3):     Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:    (a) A complete periodic inspection of the overhead crane in the boiler house was not done.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    (a) The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery and the adustable tongue at the top measured over 1.75".
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.303 E01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4000 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(e)(1)(ii):     Other markings giving voltage, current, wattage, or other ratings as necessary had not been placed on equipment being used.    (a) Warnings indicating the presence of an electrical arc flash hazard and the level of protection required had not been placed on equipment being used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.303 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2):     Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    (a) In the warehouse circuit breakers were not identified as to the purpose.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.303 H02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4000 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
Electrical installations over 600 volts nominal were not located in a vault, room, or closet or in an area surrounded by a wall, screen, or fence, and access to which controlled by lock and key or other approved means, and limited to qualified persons only.    (a) Access to electrical installations over 600 volts located in a room at the waste water treatment area was not limited to qualified persons only by the use of lock and key or other effective means.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.305 B01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):     Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    (a) Openings in boxes were not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 B01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Abate by
Dec 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):     Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    (a) An unused opening in an electrical panel at waste water was not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.305 J02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv):     Receptacles installed in wet or damp locations were not suitable for the location:    (a) The receptacle installed by an emergency shower was not provided with a cover to prevent water from splashing on the outlet and was not GFCI protected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4500

View Tsay/Ferguson Williams LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335488987.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.