DANBURY, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: AUGUSTO DASILVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUGUSTO DASILVA ENTERPRISES, LLC in 32 OSBORNE ST., DANBURY, CT 06810 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 335492625.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUGUSTO DASILVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Site address
- 32 OSBORNE ST.
- City
- DANBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06810
- Mailing
- 1 UNION AVE. UNIT #12, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Worksite: The employee who was working in the approximately 8 foot 4 inch deep trench was not provided with a means of safe egress by the use of an adequate sized ladder.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Worksite: The six foot stepladder that was used by the employee to egress the 8 feet 4 inch deep trench did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the top of the trench.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Worksite: A 6 foot stepladder was not used for the purpose in which it was designed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: Worksite: The top step of a 6 foot stepladder was used by the employee to egress the approximately 8 feet 4 inch trench in which he was working.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that excavated material from the trench that the employee was working in was placed at least two feet from the edge of the trench.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems: Worksite: An inspection of the trench and adjacent area was not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in a cave-in or other hazardous condition.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c). Worksite: The employee who was working in the approximately 8 foot 4 inch deep trench was not provided with cave in protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335492625.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.