NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: HOUSESURGEONS, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HOUSESURGEONS, LLC in 2 BOSLEY ST., NEW HAVEN, CT 06515 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 335495206.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOUSESURGEONS, LLC
- Site address
- 2 BOSLEY ST.
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06515
- Mailing
- 142 WARNER ST., HAMDEN, CT 06514
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) Worksite: The employee who was operating the Lull material handler was not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Worksite: The employees who were working on the 6 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 12 feet 3 inches were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 4, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on a pitched roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335495206.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.