CEDARTOWN, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: H & W TRANSFER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H & W TRANSFER in 404 FURNACE STREET, CEDARTOWN, GA 30125 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 335510640.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H & W TRANSFER
- Site address
- 404 FURNACE STREET
- City
- CEDARTOWN
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30125
- Mailing
- 404 FURNACE STREET, CEDARTOWN, GA 30125
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484121
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,023 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Maintenance shop - The employer did not ensure that the K & F 16 speed drill press located in the maintenance shop had a proper guard attached, exposing employee(s) to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2023
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,023 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: (a) Maintenance shop - The employer did not ensure that the work rest on the 6 inch bench grinder located in the maintenance shop was equal to or less than 1/8th inch from the grinding wheel, exposing employee(s) to a caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2023
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,517 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met. (a) Throughout site - The employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was implemented exposing employee(s) to hazards such as struck-by, caught-in and, fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $500
- · Z (S) $1517
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) Shop area - The employer did not ensure that the 500 gal. and a 250 gal. motor oil tanks that were located in the maintenance shop were marked with the proper contents of the tanks, exposing employees to possible fire and, or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Oct 31, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): (a) Throughout site -The employer did not ensure that a hazard assessment was conducted throughout the yard and shop area, exposing employees to possible struck-by, caught-in and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484121)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335510640.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.