WEST ALLIS, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: BATT'S ROOFING, DIVISION OF BATT'S, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BATT'S ROOFING, DIVISION OF BATT'S, INC. in 1127 S. 101ST ST., WEST ALLIS, WI 53214 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335517181.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BATT'S ROOFING, DIVISION OF BATT'S, INC.
- Site address
- 1127 S. 101ST ST.
- City
- WEST ALLIS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53214
- Mailing
- 9000 N. WHITE OAK LANE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53217
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets. (a) Employee was not using head protection when working under personnel, material, and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) Employees were not using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1360
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. (a) Employees were not trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335517181.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.