Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COBBLESTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COBBLESTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in STEET-PONTE CHEVROLET, 3036 STATE ROUTE 28, HERKIMER, NY 13350 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335542189.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cobblestone Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cobblestone Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
STEET-PONTE CHEVROLET, 3036 STATE ROUTE 28
City
HERKIMER
State
NY
ZIP
13350
Mailing
2145 DWYER AVENUE, UTICA, NY 13501
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 12, 2012
Abate by
Nov 11, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii):  The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used:    a) South end of building, on or about 7-31-12:  Employees were working on a flat roof without training by a competent person in the proper use personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i):  Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes:    a) South end of building, on or about 7-30-12:  One employee was working on a flat roof, without fall protection, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 16 feet 9 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $5,100
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii):  Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:    a) South end of building, on or about 7-31-12:  Employees were working on a flat roof, while connected to safety ropes that had excess slack, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 16 feet 9 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5100
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21):  Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:    a) South end of building, on or about 7-31-12:  Employees were working on a flat roof while connected to anchors that were not inspected for damage and defective components.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6):  The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    a) South end of building, on or about 7-30-12:  Employees were operating a hand held reciprocating saw, powered through an extension cord that was missing a ground pin.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a) South end of building, west side, on or about 8-1-12:  Employees were using a step ladder for roof access that was not extended 3 feet above the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of  6 feet 6 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1200
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):  Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    a) South end of building, west side, on or about 8-1-12:  Employees were using a step ladder for roof access that was not being used as designed or for its intended purpose, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 6 feet 6 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Cobblestone Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335542189.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.