HARTFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DAMON'S TAVERN
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAMON'S TAVERN in 310 PROSPECT AVENUE, HARTFORD, CT 06106 (NAICS 722211). OSHA activity number 335544383.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAMON'S TAVERN
- Site address
- 310 PROSPECT AVENUE
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06106
- Mailing
- 310 PROSPECT AVENUE, HARTFORD, CT 06106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722211
- Employees
- 39
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.263 L09 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.263(l)(9)(ii): All safety devices on the oven(s) were not inspected at intervals of not less than twice a month by a properly instructed bakery employee: Kitchen: The employer had not developed or implented an inspection schedule for the Baker's Pride Pizza Ovens on site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.263 L09 V
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.263(l)(9)(v): When fuel was supplied and used at line pressure, safety shutoff valves were not provided in the fuel line leading to the burner: Kitchen: No safety shutoff valves were provided at any of the gas appliances in the kitchen including the gas stove, grill, pizza ovens and fryers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: Kitchen: A. Sharp 1000W/R-21LC Commercial Microwave was energized through a relocatable power tap. Listing and labeling instructions require the microwave to be plugged directly into a wall receptacle. B. Four wall-mount listed electrical boxes with knockouts were used as pendant power drops.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.304 B04 II B
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(B): Where connected to a branch circuit supplying two or more receptacles or outlets, a receptacle may not supply a total cord- and plug-connected load in excess of the maximum specified in Table S-4: Kitchen: Behind the Vulcan refrigerator unit, a 15-amp relocatable power tap was used to energize a Sharp R-21LCF 14-amp Microwave Oven. NOTE: Table S-4 states that on a 15 or 20 amp circuit, a 15-amp receptacle has a maximum load of 12-amps.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Company-Wide: The employer had not developed or implemented a written Hazard Communication Program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to detergents, degreasers and natural gas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1750
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: Company-Wide: The employer had not certified that a hazard assessment had been conducted to determine the hazards to which employees were exposed and the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment to be worn.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722211)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335544383.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.