Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: DAMON'S TAVERN

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAMON'S TAVERN in 310 PROSPECT AVENUE, HARTFORD, CT 06106 (NAICS 722211). OSHA activity number 335544383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Damon'S Tavern for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Damon'S Tavern is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAMON'S TAVERN
Site address
310 PROSPECT AVENUE
City
HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06106
Mailing
310 PROSPECT AVENUE, HARTFORD, CT 06106
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722211
Employees
39
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.263 L09 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.263(l)(9)(ii):   All safety devices on the oven(s) were not inspected at intervals of not less than twice a month by a properly instructed bakery employee:    Kitchen:  The employer had not developed or implented an inspection schedule for the Baker's Pride Pizza Ovens on site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.263 L09 V

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.263(l)(9)(v):   When fuel was supplied and used at line pressure, safety shutoff valves were not provided in the fuel line leading to the burner:            Kitchen:  No safety shutoff valves were provided at any of the gas appliances in the kitchen including the gas stove, grill, pizza ovens and fryers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:     Kitchen:    A.  Sharp 1000W/R-21LC Commercial Microwave was energized through a relocatable power tap.  Listing and labeling instructions require the microwave to be plugged directly into a wall receptacle.  B.  Four wall-mount listed electrical boxes with knockouts were used as pendant power drops.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.304 B04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4)(ii)(B):   Where connected to a branch circuit supplying two or more receptacles or outlets, a receptacle may not supply a total cord- and plug-connected load in excess of the maximum specified in Table S-4:    Kitchen:  Behind the Vulcan refrigerator unit, a 15-amp relocatable power tap was used to energize a Sharp R-21LCF 14-amp Microwave Oven.   NOTE:  Table S-4 states that on a 15 or 20 amp circuit, a 15-amp receptacle has a maximum load of 12-amps.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Dec 14, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):   Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):      Company-Wide:  The employer had not developed or implemented a written Hazard Communication Program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to detergents, degreasers and natural gas.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2012
Abate by
Oct 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:          Company-Wide:  The employer had not certified that a hazard assessment had been conducted to determine the hazards to which employees were exposed and the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment to be worn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335544383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.