OSHA Inspection: REEF SERVICES, LLC

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i): The employer did not compile information pertaining to the technology of the process:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not compile information pertaining to the technology of the process in accordance with A thru E of this section.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):  Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID's):    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not maintain accurate piping and instrumental diagrams.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(G): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include material and energy balances for processes built after May 26, 1992.    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not develop and maintain material and energy balances for the process.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer had not conducted an initial process hazard analysis.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and addressing elements (i) through (iv) of this part:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not edevelop and implement written operating procedures for employees that provided clear instructions and addressed each step of the operating phase, the operating limits, safety and health considerations, and safety systems and their functions.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of 29 CFR 1910.119:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not train each employee involved in operating a process.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(g)(3): The employer did not ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process received and understood the training required by paragraph (g) of 29 CFR 1910.119 and did not prepare a record which contained the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not document that each employees received and understood training.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1): The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety review for new facilities and for modified facilities when the modification was significant enough to require a change in the process safety information:    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not perform a pre-startup saety review.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):  The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment.    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(3):  The employer did not train each employee involved in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment in an overview of that process and its hazards and in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to assure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner.    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not train each employee involved in maintaining the on-going integrity of process equipment.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1):  The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process.    This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures.

Issued

Jan 2, 2013

Abate by

Feb 15, 2013

Penalty

Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):  Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.     This violation was discovered on July 5, 2012, when the employer did not develop, document and utilize specific procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.