BIRMINGHAM, AL ·
OSHA Inspection: GILCO MACHINE & WELDING, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GILCO MACHINE & WELDING, INC in 608 RAILROAD AVE, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35217 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 335610788.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GILCO MACHINE & WELDING, INC
- Site address
- 608 RAILROAD AVE
- City
- BIRMINGHAM
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35217
- Mailing
- 608 RAILROAD AVE, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35217
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) On or about 08/07/2012 - The employer did not establish a lockout/tagout program for employees engaged in service and maintenance activities involving lathes and changing dies.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) On or about 08/07/12 - The TARNOW 16 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (b) On or about 08/07/12 - The AJAX 20 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (c) On or about 08/07/12 - The NILES 30-32 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (d) On or about 08/07/12 - The SIDNEY 16 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (e) On or about 08/07/12 - The JET 1550 15 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (f) On or about 08/07/12 - The VDF EL-B1080 32 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (g) On or about 08/07/12 - The IKEDA Drill Press RM 1375 was not guarded. (h) On or about 08/07/12 - The American Hole Nizard was not guarded. (i) On or about 08/07/12 - The VDF SKODA 80 inch lathe chuck was not guarded. (j) On or about 08/07/12 - The SHODA 91 vet lathe chuck was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: (a) On or about 08/07/2012 - Bay #1, the work rest was adjusted to 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: (a) On or about 08/07/2012 - Bay #1, the tongue guard on the Baldor floor grinder was adjusted to 3/4 inches.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months: (a) On or about 08/07/2012 - A complete periodic inspection of the overhead DESHAZO crane had not been conducted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2012
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch: (a) On or about 08/07/2012 - The floor fan in Bay 3 had openings greater than 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $240
- · Z (O) $400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335610788.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.