Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GILCO MACHINE & WELDING, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GILCO MACHINE & WELDING, INC in 608 RAILROAD AVE, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35217 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 335610788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gilco Machine & Welding, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gilco Machine & Welding, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
608 RAILROAD AVE
City
BIRMINGHAM
State
AL
ZIP
35217
Mailing
608 RAILROAD AVE, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35217
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    (a)  On or about 08/07/2012 - The employer did not establish a lockout/tagout program for employees engaged in service and maintenance activities involving lathes and changing dies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 23, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a)  On or about 08/07/12 - The TARNOW 16 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (b)  On or about 08/07/12 -  The AJAX 20 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (c)  On or about 08/07/12 -  The NILES 30-32 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (d)  On or about 08/07/12 -  The SIDNEY 16 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (e)  On or about 08/07/12 - The JET 1550 15 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (f)  On or about 08/07/12 - The VDF EL-B1080 32 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (g)  On or about 08/07/12 - The IKEDA Drill Press RM 1375 was not guarded.    (h)  On or about 08/07/12 - The American Hole Nizard was not guarded.    (i)   On or about 08/07/12 - The VDF SKODA 80 inch lathe chuck was not guarded.    (j)  On or about 08/07/12 - The SHODA 91 vet lathe chuck was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1440
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):  Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    (a)  On or about 08/07/2012 - Bay #1, the work rest was adjusted to 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1440
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    (a)  On or about 08/07/2012 - Bay #1, the tongue guard on the Baldor floor grinder was adjusted to 3/4 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 19, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:    (a)  On or about 08/07/2012 - A complete periodic inspection of the overhead DESHAZO crane had not been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.212 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2012
Abate by
Oct 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch:    (a)  On or about 08/07/2012 - The floor fan in Bay 3 had openings greater than 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $240
  • · Z (O) $400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 335610788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.